block deck height

Newbies, and basic Stroker Recipes... Get started with your first stroker here!!
Post Reply
israelcj7
Noob
Noob
Posts: 19
Joined: March 23rd, 2009, 3:30 am
Stroker Displacement: 282

block deck height

Post by israelcj7 »

good morning to all of you jeep dreamers :P
is the block deck height of the 4.2l and the 4.0l are the same?
if i take 4.0l crank and rods and std pistons and put it in a 4.2 block will the piston deck clearance be the same as on 4.0l block?
is there any difference in deck height between production years?
if i use 4.0l crank,rods and 0.30 4.2l pistons in 4.2 block will the piston deck clearance still be the same as 4.0l ?
don't ask me why do i want to do this because i know it's stupid but my brother said it can't be done and the math' say it can.
thanks in advance :worship:
feel good and have a nice day :cheers:


lishay
israel :rockout: :rockout:
atias
Making Progress
Making Progress
Posts: 99
Joined: March 22nd, 2008, 9:43 am

Re: block deck height

Post by atias »

well... you and your brother can come pay me the visit that you promised and take a look at this magic book that i have :) :)
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3190
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: block deck height

Post by Cheromaniac »

4.2L engine: Bore 3.750", stroke 3.895", deck height 9.487-9.493", rod length 5.875", piston compression height 1.601" ('71-'78) 1.653" ('79-'90), deck clearance 0.0665" ('71-'78) 0.0145" ('79-'90)
4.0L engine: Bore 3.875", stroke 3.411", deck height 9.450-9.456", rod length 6.125", piston compression height 1.601", deck clearance 0.0215"

To answer your questions:

is the block deck height of the 4.2l and the 4.0l are the same? No
if i take 4.0l crank and rods and std pistons and put it in a 4.2 block will the piston deck clearance be the same as on 4.0l block? A 4.0 crank, 4.0 rods, and standard 4.2 pistons ('79+) in a 4.2 block would work. Deck clearance would be just 0.006" and you'd end up with a destroker displacing 226ci or 3704cc (3.7L), though static compression ratio with the 4.2 heads would be a hopelessly low 7.2:1. The 4.0 heads would improve the CR to 7.9:1.
is there any difference in deck height between production years? It's the same for all '71-'90 4.2 blocks and for all '87-'06 4.0 blocks.
if i use 4.0l crank,rods and 0.30 4.2l pistons in 4.2 block will the piston deck clearance still be the same as 4.0l? Displacement would be 3764cc with such a set-up but deck clearance would depend on the compression height of the aftermarket 4.2 pistons.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car :mrgreen:
israelcj7
Noob
Noob
Posts: 19
Joined: March 23rd, 2009, 3:30 am
Stroker Displacement: 282

Re: block deck height

Post by israelcj7 »

thanks man :worship:
if i understand correct when you take 4.0l crank,rods and std pistons and put it in 4.2 block(here in israel we oversize the bore on 4.2l block to 4.0l std size) there is no way that the piston would be 4 millimeter(0.157) down the bore?
i know that it's not the way to go but for the sake of argument with my brother :mrgreen:
User avatar
Cheromaniac
I live here
I live here
Posts: 3190
Joined: March 8th, 2008, 12:58 pm
Stroker Displacement: 4563cc
Vehicle Year: 1992
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Cyprus
Contact:

Re: block deck height

Post by Cheromaniac »

OK, now I got you. You're talking about using standard 4.0 pistons in a 4.2 block. I didn't think you could overbore the 4.2 block that far but I guess it must be possible. I really can't see the point of using the 4.0L crank, rods, and pistons in the 4.2L block. Displacement will be the same as a standard 4.0 i.e. 3958cc but deck clearance will be 0.0585" instead of 0.0215" 'cause the 4.2L block is slightly taller.
With so many 4.0L blocks being available cheaply in the junkyards, using a 4.2L block as the basis for any engine build seems a waste of time unless you already have one for free.
1992 XJ 4.6 I6 - 5MT - Stroker build-up, Stroker "recipes" Sold
1995 Mustang GT - 4AT - Modded Sold
2006 Mustang GT - 5MT - Modded Midlife Crisis Car :mrgreen:
israelcj7
Noob
Noob
Posts: 19
Joined: March 23rd, 2009, 3:30 am
Stroker Displacement: 282

Re: block deck height

Post by israelcj7 »

Well in israel anything is possible even overbored 4.2 block to 4.0 size :mrgreen:
by the way i won :banana:
so many many thanks for the great info :cheers: :worship:
great forum, great people :rockout: :rockout:
atias
Making Progress
Making Progress
Posts: 99
Joined: March 22nd, 2008, 9:43 am

Re: block deck height

Post by atias »

just make sure that your brother is unarmed when you'll show him that you won :) :) :smack:
israelcj7
Noob
Noob
Posts: 19
Joined: March 23rd, 2009, 3:30 am
Stroker Displacement: 282

Re: block deck height

Post by israelcj7 »

:lol: :lol: :lol:
it's ok. i'm heavily armed as well plus i know were he keeps the clip :boom:
User avatar
darkcorp
I made it to triple digits!
I made it to triple digits!
Posts: 101
Joined: November 14th, 2013, 12:21 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 1999
Vehicle Make: JEEP
Vehicle Model: GCh 4.0
Location: Kazan/Russia
Contact:

Re: block deck height

Post by darkcorp »

Hi!
How can I measure actual cylinder block height by myself? Only by dropping crank with bearings, rods and pistons? Or there might be another way?
Russ Pottenger
Strong Poster
Strong Poster
Posts: 896
Joined: August 15th, 2009, 1:27 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.7
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee

Re: block deck height

Post by Russ Pottenger »

darkcorp wrote:Hi!
How can I measure actual cylinder block height by myself? Only by dropping crank with bearings, rods and pistons? Or there might be another way?
I use a 8-9" micrometer with a .200 ball end attachment.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests