Page 1 of 2

Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: May 1st, 2012, 3:41 am
by ca2a18
Hi,
All of this going in a Jeep Wrangler 97 that I 'm building for the street and strip. With 4 wheeling.

Parts list:

TURBO Garrett GT40
Tial wastegate 44mm
Tial BOV 50mm
Injector
Fuel system
B&M Shifter

Image"http://www.qzal.net"
http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/posti ... e=post&f=8#

Image"http://www.qzal.net"

Image"http://www.qzal.net"

Image"http://www.qzal.net"

Image"http://www.qzal.net"

Image"http://www.qzal.net"

Image"http://www.qzal.net"

Image"http://www.qzal.net"

Image"http://www.qzal.net"

Image"http://www.qzal.net"

Image"http://www.qzal.net"

Image"http://www.qzal.net"

Image"http://www.qzal.net"
:wiggle:

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40 with Dyno result

Posted: May 1st, 2012, 3:48 am
by ca2a18
Dyno result soon

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: May 1st, 2012, 9:26 pm
by gradon
Yeah. . . that's um. . . pretty cool

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: May 2nd, 2012, 4:51 am
by doublins
No intercooler? How much boost are you planning on running?

p.s. props to you- I absolutely love turbochargers, have owned several vehicles that I installed aftermarket turbos on, and there is just no equal.

That being said, if you´re going to run any legitimate amount of boost, I fear you will have problems with your IATs without an intercooler, unless it is cold where you live. It would never work in summer in Maryland, though.

Re: Stock engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: May 2nd, 2012, 2:49 pm
by ca2a18
Thanks a lot Doublins for your comment >>>>>>>>>>
Unfortunately I don't buy intercooler until now and I will buy one soon, I running on dyno 332WHP and 385TQ with only 8 PSI of boost. :rockout:
Now summer is begin and my ghost :hrhr: sleep until the summer is finished because the weather is too much hot :oops:

My plan to make stroker at less 4.8L and increase more boost around 20 PSI

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: May 2nd, 2012, 2:55 pm
by CobraMarty
If you use a bored throttle body and 99+ intake manifold you would see more HP/TQ at same boost.

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: May 2nd, 2012, 3:11 pm
by 604rail_king
An intercooler is still a good part to have, but you could lower your air temps with using an water/meth kit in the mean time. I'd suggest running 100% water for now until you boost higher and need the added fuel (meth).

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: May 2nd, 2012, 3:18 pm
by ca2a18

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: May 2nd, 2012, 5:37 pm
by atias
604rail_king wrote:An intercooler is still a good part to have, but you could lower your air temps with using an water/meth kit in the mean time. I'd suggest running 100% water for now until you boost higher and need the added fuel (meth).

i think you should definitely have this(water&methanol)
i'm running 50/50 mix, its gives you an intercooler effect,raises the octan level to about 110-116 (according to what the snow performance and aem says), eliminating detonation, and your get a much bigger tuning window without damagin the engine

:cheers:

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: May 3rd, 2012, 1:53 am
by ca2a18
CobraMarty wrote:If you use a bored throttle body and 99+ intake manifold you would see more HP/TQ at same boost.
Thanks a lot CobraMarty >>>>>>>>>>>>
I know that when bored throttle body and 99+ intake manifold you would see more HP and TQ but I fear for engine damage, :brickwall: because I don't have intercooler

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: May 3rd, 2012, 2:03 am
by ca2a18
604rail_king wrote:An intercooler is still a good part to have, but you could lower your air temps with using an water/meth kit in the mean time. I'd suggest running 100% water for now until you boost higher and need the added fuel (meth).
Thanks a lot 604rail_king for your devise >>>>>>>>>>>
I bought AEM water injection kit and I will Install it & see the result.

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: May 3rd, 2012, 2:06 am
by ca2a18
atias wrote:
604rail_king wrote:An intercooler is still a good part to have, but you could lower your air temps with using an water/meth kit in the mean time. I'd suggest running 100% water for now until you boost higher and need the added fuel (meth).

i think you should definitely have this(water&methanol)
i'm running 50/50 mix, its gives you an intercooler effect,raises the octan level to about 110-116 (according to what the snow performance and aem says), eliminating detonation, and your get a much bigger tuning window without damagin the engine

:cheers:

I will try to put VP fuel race Q16 and meth

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: May 3rd, 2012, 3:10 am
by atias
you need the C-16 is for high intake temps not the Q-16 ,i think the Q16 is highly oxygenated to gain more power. not good for you


:cheers:

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: May 3rd, 2012, 3:31 am
by ca2a18
atias wrote:you need the C-16 is for high intake temps not the Q-16 ,i think the Q16 is highly oxygenated to gain more power. not good for you


:cheers:

Unfortunately I bought Q16 for it , and I will see what performance I will get.

Re: Stoke engine 4.0L turbo GT40

Posted: May 3rd, 2012, 2:37 pm
by CobraMarty
CobraMarty wrote:If you use a bored throttle body and 99+ intake manifold you would see more HP/TQ at same boost.
Yes it will be more power but with less boost and with less boost-less heat with no intercooler. Safer.