maximum head porting

Performance mods and Advanced Stroker discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
Plechtan
Donator
Donator
Posts: 667
Joined: August 28th, 2008, 9:00 am
Stroker Displacement: 5.0L 4x4
Vehicle Year: 1988
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Comanche
Location: Woodstock, IL
Contact:

maximum head porting

Post by Plechtan »

Does anybody have a old cylinder head( maybe a cracked 331?) they would be willing to take a band saw to? I would like to see a cut down the center of the exhaust and intake ports , as well as a cut between the ports, centered on the head bolt and between the intake and exhaust. this would give some idea how much material exists and where the water jacket is. The cut through the valve guide would show material around the bowl. The only head i have here is from a 90 comanche. I don't think is is worthwhile to put allot of work into a non HO head.
Peter Lechtanski
The worlds Fastest Comanche Prroject
User avatar
Alex22
Consistent
Consistent
Posts: 273
Joined: March 7th, 2008, 7:37 pm

Re: maximum head porting

Post by Alex22 »

I've got a 0721 or 0630 laying around that I took a saw to. Hopefully I'll remember to take pictures at work tomorrow.
The enemy of good thing is wanting something better.
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: maximum head porting

Post by SilverXJ »

Someone already has done this. I have the images on my computer at work. I'll try to remember to put them up tomorrow.
5-90
I made it to triple digits!
I made it to triple digits!
Posts: 163
Joined: February 19th, 2008, 9:16 pm
Location: Hammerspace
Contact:

Re: maximum head porting

Post by 5-90 »

SilverXJ wrote:Someone already has done this. I have the images on my computer at work. I'll try to remember to put them up tomorrow.
Please do! I've not yet done so myself, but I have a #0630 (cracked,) a #2685 (late 258ci,) and a #2686 (not for anything else) so far, and I'd eventually like to get the #7120 and #0331 as well - and section a cylinder on each (and section the rest of the head /by/ cylinder for porting experiments...
Kelley's Works in Progress - http://www.kelleyswip.com
KWiP Parts Exchange - http://www.kelleyswip.com/exchange.html

"I don't think any of us will ever forget Louie. Ever since the explosion, there's been a little piece of him on all of us..."
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: maximum head porting

Post by SilverXJ »

Image
Image
User avatar
1bolt
Donator
Donator
Posts: 545
Joined: January 18th, 2008, 4:06 pm
Location: Culpeper Virginia

Re: maximum head porting

Post by 1bolt »

Very nice pics. The area's to worry about busting through aren't the roof or floor, but the push rod pinch point. Although if you're getting really aggressive the short side radius could become a problem.
--
Simon
Looking for a 232 crankshaft see my want ad: http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/viewt ... =17&t=1292
http://www.jeepstrokers.com 94 XJ Stroked lifted locked. 89 MJ restored Work truck, 88 YJ going on third build up and second Stroker.
User avatar
Plechtan
Donator
Donator
Posts: 667
Joined: August 28th, 2008, 9:00 am
Stroker Displacement: 5.0L 4x4
Vehicle Year: 1988
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Comanche
Location: Woodstock, IL
Contact:

Re: maximum head porting

Post by Plechtan »

This is a intake port i assume, but what model head? The scaryiest thing i see is the holes for the rocker bolts! no wonder they crack when you put 7/16 studs in.
The exhaust port it the thing that has the most restriction, i would really like to see a section of that. This picture shows how much material we have top and bottom, but it would be interesting to see how much room there is side to side.
Peter Lechtanski
The worlds Fastest Comanche Prroject
User avatar
SilverXJ
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5790
Joined: February 14th, 2008, 7:14 am
Stroker Displacement: 4.6L
Vehicle Year: 2000
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Cherokee
Location: Radford, Va

Re: maximum head porting

Post by SilverXJ »

Its a 7120 or 0630 head going off the location and shape of the exhaust ports.
User avatar
Alex22
Consistent
Consistent
Posts: 273
Joined: March 7th, 2008, 7:37 pm

Re: maximum head porting

Post by Alex22 »

I snapped these with my phone today. Its a 0721 head, for some reason i cut the rocker studs off with a sawzall before loading it in the band saw. But if I ever start working on this again and use stud mount rocker arms I would consider using an end mill and offset plunge into the existing hole to try to get it centered better.
Intake
Image

Image

Exhaust
Image

Image


Hope this helps.
The enemy of good thing is wanting something better.
5-90
I made it to triple digits!
I made it to triple digits!
Posts: 163
Joined: February 19th, 2008, 9:16 pm
Location: Hammerspace
Contact:

Re: maximum head porting

Post by 5-90 »

Nice - although I'd like to section a bit more when I finally collect and chop up my heads.

SilverXJ - can you confirm the number of that head you've pictured?
Kelley's Works in Progress - http://www.kelleyswip.com
KWiP Parts Exchange - http://www.kelleyswip.com/exchange.html

"I don't think any of us will ever forget Louie. Ever since the explosion, there's been a little piece of him on all of us..."
User avatar
Plechtan
Donator
Donator
Posts: 667
Joined: August 28th, 2008, 9:00 am
Stroker Displacement: 5.0L 4x4
Vehicle Year: 1988
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Comanche
Location: Woodstock, IL
Contact:

Re: maximum head porting

Post by Plechtan »

I assume the top 2 pictures are the intake, and the others exhaust.

Has anybody tried to build up material on the intake port floor? The chevy 6 had great success with a "lump port design" I will see if i ca get some picts of this. They actually raised the floor and instead of having a smooth curve into the valve area, the floor of the port had a hump or lump on it, it tended to increase velocity. Epoxy was commonly used on the intakes, and some people even tried to build up the exhaust port with weld.
Peter Lechtanski
The worlds Fastest Comanche Prroject
User avatar
Plechtan
Donator
Donator
Posts: 667
Joined: August 28th, 2008, 9:00 am
Stroker Displacement: 5.0L 4x4
Vehicle Year: 1988
Vehicle Make: Jeep
Vehicle Model: Comanche
Location: Woodstock, IL
Contact:

Re: maximum head porting

Post by Plechtan »

I found som pictures of the Chevy lump port.
ShortTurnWithLumpVeiw1.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Peter Lechtanski
The worlds Fastest Comanche Prroject
User avatar
Alex22
Consistent
Consistent
Posts: 273
Joined: March 7th, 2008, 7:37 pm

Re: maximum head porting

Post by Alex22 »

Plechtan wrote:I assume the top 2 pictures are the intake, and the others exhaust.

Has anybody tried to build up material on the intake port floor? The chevy 6 had great success with a "lump port design" I will see if i ca get some picts of this. They actually raised the floor and instead of having a smooth curve into the valve area, the floor of the port had a hump or lump on it, it tended to increase velocity. Epoxy was commonly used on the intakes, and some people even tried to build up the exhaust port with weld.
Yep, top 2 are intakes and the bottom 2 are the exhaust.


The same thing is also done on the Ford BOSS 302 heads. The reason the ports respond so well to the port stuffers is that they were a poor design to begin with.

If you look at picture the pictures you posted of the lump port chevy you can see how the stock port had a flat floor that led up to the ~80* angle leading up to the seat. Picture #1 shows how the port now has a swooping lump that starts to turn the air before it gets to the sharp turn. I don't think that the jeep head will see the large gains that both the lump port and BOSS heads had.
When a port has a nicely shaped short side with a properly sized runner leading up to it the stuffers will have little to no effect on the ports. The worse a port is to begin with the easier it is to make gains on, but, the ports on the 4.0 heads are already pretty nice.
The enemy of good thing is wanting something better.
User avatar
1bolt
Donator
Donator
Posts: 545
Joined: January 18th, 2008, 4:06 pm
Location: Culpeper Virginia

Re: maximum head porting

Post by 1bolt »

I agree with Alex and was going to point out the exact same things. The idea behind those radical mods is to make a very poorly designed port work more like a well designed port...

The 4.0 HO head flows better than many BIG BLOCK muscle car heads of the 60's.
--
Simon
Looking for a 232 crankshaft see my want ad: http://www.jeepstrokers.com/forum/viewt ... =17&t=1292
http://www.jeepstrokers.com 94 XJ Stroked lifted locked. 89 MJ restored Work truck, 88 YJ going on third build up and second Stroker.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest